GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking700not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.44no data
Power efficiency1.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV790GT216
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 April 2009 (15 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80048
Core clock speed850 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors959 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate34.008.000
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS0.1056 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed975 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.8 GB/s25.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2009 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 23 Watt

ATI HD 4890 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 330M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 726.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4890 and GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4890 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4890
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4890 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.