UHD Graphics 605 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1067
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.31
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV740Gemini Lake GT1.5
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 September 2009 (15 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640144
Core clock speed730 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors826 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate23.3613.50
Floating-point processing power0.9344 TFLOPS0.216 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs3218

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 5 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4750 and UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4750 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4750
Radeon HD 4750
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 56 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 804 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.