HD Graphics 3000 vs Radeon HD 4550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

ATI HD 4550
2008
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.61

HD Graphics 3000 outperforms Radeon HD 4550 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11631147
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)
GPU code nameRV710Sandy Bridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2008 (15 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59 no data
Current price$116 (2x MSRP)$476

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 4550 and HD Graphics 3000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8012
Core clock speed600 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors242 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate4.80013.80
Floating-point performance96 gflops20.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 4550 and HD Graphics 3000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1310 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth10.48 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4550 0.61
HD Graphics 3000 0.66
+8.2%

HD Graphics 3000 outperforms Radeon HD 4550 by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 4550 235
HD Graphics 3000 254
+8.1%

HD Graphics 3000 outperforms Radeon HD 4550 by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.66
Recency 30 September 2008 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 32 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 4550 and HD Graphics 3000.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4550 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4550
Radeon HD 4550
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 99 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 2196 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.