Tegra 2 GPU vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1273not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.27no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameRV710Tegra 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)3 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data400 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8001.600
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3ES 2.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2008 3 June 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm

Tegra 2 GPU has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4350 and Tegra 2 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop card while Tegra 2 GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIA Tegra 2 GPU
Tegra 2 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 220 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.