Tegra 3 GPU vs Radeon RX 460 1024SP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinTegra 3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 January 2017 (7 years ago)9 November 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1090 MHz416 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate76.804.160
Floating-point processing power2.458 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2017 9 November 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

RX 460 1024SP has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 3 GPU, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 460 1024SP and Tegra 3 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 1024SP is a desktop card while Tegra 3 GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
Radeon RX 460 1024SP
NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU
Tegra 3 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 785 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Tegra 3 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.