GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4350 and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4350
2008
512 MB DDR3, 20 Watt
0.36

GTX 1650 outperforms ATI HD 4350 by a whopping 5375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1273274
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.40
Power efficiency1.2918.81
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV710TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80896
Core clock speed600 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors242 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80093.24
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.36
GTX 1650 19.71
+5375%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 145
GTX 1650 7875
+5331%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4350 688
GTX 1650 44694
+6396%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−1050%
69
+1050%
1440p0−140
4K-0−123

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16
1440pno data3.73
4Kno data6.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−467%
17
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1467%
94
+1467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1825%
77
+1825%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1186%
90
+1186%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1133%
74
+1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1857%
130−140
+1857%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−600%
28
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
World of Tanks 14−16
−1579%
230−240
+1579%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−933%
62
+933%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−771%
61
+771%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8500%
170−180
+8500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7
+133%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Valorant 5−6
−700%
40
+700%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dota 2 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 18
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3
+50%
Dota 2 14−16
−293%
59
+293%
Valorant 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Valorant 85
+0%
85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Dota 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Fortnite 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75
+0%
75
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 70
+0%
70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 1050% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 is 8500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 33 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 19.71
Recency 30 September 2008 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 275% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 5375% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 221 vote

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24463 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.