Arc Pro A50 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1271not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.35no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV710DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801024
Core clock speed600 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors242 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800150.4
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2008 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 275% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4350 and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop card while Arc Pro A50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
Intel Arc Pro A50
Arc Pro A50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 222 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4350 or Arc Pro A50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.