GeForce GT 220 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4250 and GeForce GT 220, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4250
2009
512 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.28

220 outperforms HD 4250 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13761267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.900.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV620GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 February 2009 (16 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4048
Core clock speed594 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors181 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate2.37610.00
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPS0.1306 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416
L2 Cache64 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/s25.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoVGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4250 0.28
GT 220 0.50
+78.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4250 122
Samples: 880
GT 220 222
+82%
Samples: 2211

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−110%
21
+110%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4250 and GT 220 compete in popular games:

  • GT 220 is 110% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 220 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 220 performs better in 17 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.50
Recency 25 February 2009 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 58 Watt

ATI HD 4250 has 132% lower power consumption.

GT 220, on the other hand, has a 78.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 847 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4250 or GeForce GT 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.