GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1349not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameRS880GK208
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 2009 (15 years ago)29 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40384
Core clock speed500 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors181 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00028.86
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPS0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.01.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2009 29 May 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

GT 630 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4200 and GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4200
Radeon HD 4200
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 275 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 64 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.