GeForce 9400M vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3470 with GeForce 9400M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 3470
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.31
+19.2%

ATI HD 3470 outperforms 9400M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13231352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.711.49
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV620C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 January 2008 (16 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4016
Core clock speed800 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors181 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2004.640
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed950 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth15.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 3470 0.31
+19.2%
GeForce 9400M 0.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3470 118
+16.8%
GeForce 9400M 101

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.26
Recency 23 January 2008 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 12 Watt

ATI HD 3470 has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9400M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3470 is a desktop card while GeForce 9400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3470
Radeon HD 3470
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 53 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 44 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.