Radeon R7 265 vs ATI HD 3200 Mobile IGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.25
Power efficiencyno data4.83
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRS780Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401024
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors180 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00059.20
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPS1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.01.2
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2009 13 February 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

R7 265 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP and Radeon R7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP is a notebook card while Radeon R7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 373 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.