UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameR600Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32032
Core clock speed743 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)240 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.89no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length315 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1656 MBpsno data
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XTX and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 XTX is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.