UHD Graphics vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated602
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Power efficiencyno data38.91
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameR600Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320256
Core clock speed743 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate11.8912.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Length315 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1656 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 2300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XTX and UHD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 XTX is a desktop card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6107 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.