ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs ATI HD 2900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking931not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR600RV670
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320320
Core clock speed743 MHz777 MHz
Number of transistors720 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate11.8912.43
Floating-point processing power0.4755 TFLOPS0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz1126 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s72.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 110 Watt

ATI HD 2950 XTX has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 95.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XT and Radeon HD 2950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
Radeon HD 2950 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.