Radeon 780M vs HD 2900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 2900 XT with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 2900 XT
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 215 Watt
1.71

Radeon 780M outperforms ATI HD 2900 XT by a whopping 973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking891283
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3
GPU code nameR600Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320768
Core clock speed743 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3000 MHz
Number of transistors720 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate11.89139.2
Floating-point performance475.5 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 2900 XT and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1656 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 2900 XT 1.71
Radeon 780M 18.35
+973%

780M outperforms HD 2900 XT by 973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 2900 XT 659
Radeon 780M 7087
+975%

780M outperforms HD 2900 XT by 975% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1100%
36
+1100%
1440p1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%
4K1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
−926%
400−450
+926%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−900%
600−650
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−846%
350−400
+846%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
−868%
300−310
+868%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−947%
450−500
+947%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−920%
500−550
+920%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−971%
900−950
+971%
Hitman 3 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%
Horizon Zero Dawn 97
−931%
1000−1050
+931%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−966%
650−700
+966%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−880%
500−550
+880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
−916%
650−700
+916%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
−876%
400−450
+876%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−900%
600−650
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−846%
350−400
+846%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−942%
250−260
+942%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−947%
450−500
+947%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−920%
500−550
+920%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−971%
900−950
+971%
Hitman 3 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−927%
750−800
+927%
Metro Exodus 21
−948%
220−230
+948%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−880%
500−550
+880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−938%
550−600
+938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−878%
450−500
+878%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−971%
600−650
+971%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−846%
350−400
+846%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−943%
240−250
+943%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−947%
450−500
+947%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−971%
900−950
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
−938%
550−600
+938%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
−878%
450−500
+878%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−934%
300−310
+934%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−956%
190−200
+956%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−880%
500−550
+880%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−900%
350−400
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−953%
200−210
+953%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−943%
240−250
+943%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Far Cry 5 27
−937%
280−290
+937%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−872%
350−400
+872%
Hitman 3 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−846%
350−400
+846%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−838%
300−310
+838%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−950%
210−220
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−900%
300−310
+900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Hitman 3 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−967%
160−170
+967%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−940%
260−270
+940%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%

This is how ATI HD 2900 XT and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 1100% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 2000% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 1300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.71 18.35
Recency 14 May 2007 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 80 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 54 Watt

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2900 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 XT is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 61 vote

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1088 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.