Arctic Sound-M vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1217not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.10no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRV630Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1208192
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors390 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800230.4
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 500 Watt

ATI HD 2600 PRO has 1328.6% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 239 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.