Arc 3 A370M vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking966not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Power efficiency9.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRenoirDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481024
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0099.20
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Graphics has 133% lower power consumption.

Arc 3 A370M, on the other hand, has a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8306 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or Arc 3 A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.