Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Place in the ranking	667	204
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	53.94
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2022−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Raphael	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	26 September 2022 (2 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	2048
Core clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	129.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.43

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.36
+518%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+569%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+466%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2338

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+505%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−488%

100−110
+488%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Elden Ring	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −515%	80−85 +515%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −488%	100−105 +488%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −507%	85−90 +507%
Valorant	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −515%	80−85 +515%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Dota 2	14 −507%	85−90 +507%
Elden Ring	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Far Cry 5	23 −509%	140−150 +509%
Fortnite	24−27 −515%	160−170 +515%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −491%	65−70 +491%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −507%	85−90 +507%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −505%	230−240 +505%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −507%	85−90 +507%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −500%	90−95 +500%
Valorant	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
World of Tanks	70−75 −508%	450−500 +508%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −515%	80−85 +515%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Dota 2	37 −495%	220−230 +495%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −491%	130−140 +491%
Forza Horizon 4	9 −511%	55−60 +511%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −505%	230−240 +505%
Valorant	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Elden Ring	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −500%	180−190 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
World of Tanks	30−35 −494%	190−200 +494%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Valorant	12−14 −515%	80−85 +515%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Elden Ring	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −515%	80−85 +515%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Fortnite	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Valorant	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 488% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.43	27.36
Recency	26 September 2022	26 February 2024
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 517.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.