Quadro M5000 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with Quadro M5000, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.28

M5000 outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking674236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.26
Power efficiencyno data11.24
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRaphaelGM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)29 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,856.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282048
Core clock speedno data861 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data132.9
Floating-point processing powerno data4.252 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2" (5.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno data256 Bit
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1653 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 211 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)no data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−429%
90−95
+429%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data31.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−429%
90−95
+429%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Valorant 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Dota 2 14
−436%
75−80
+436%
Far Cry 5 23
−422%
120−130
+422%
Fortnite 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Valorant 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
World of Tanks 70−75
−441%
400−450
+441%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Dota 2 37
−441%
200−210
+441%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
Valorant 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Dota 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−417%
150−160
+417%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
World of Tanks 30−35
−448%
170−180
+448%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Valorant 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Dota 2 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Fortnite 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Valorant 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Quadro M5000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 429% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.28 23.60
Recency 26 September 2022 29 June 2015
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M5000, on the other hand, has a 451.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while Quadro M5000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 259 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 78 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.