ATI Radeon X1800 XL vs E9550 MXM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameEllesmereR520
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 September 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1120 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1266 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate182.38.000
Floating-point processing power5.834 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2016 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 70 Watt

E9550 MXM has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1800 XL, on the other hand, has 35.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9550 MXM and Radeon X1800 XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9550 MXM is a notebook card while Radeon X1800 XL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Radeon E9550 MXM
ATI Radeon X1800 XL
Radeon X1800 XL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E9550 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon X1800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.