HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon E8950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 505 510 515 520 530

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E8950 and HD Graphics 510, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon E8950
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 95 Watt
12.94
+780%

E8950 outperforms HD Graphics 510 by a whopping 780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4201020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.557.59
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameAmethystSkylake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2015 (10 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Core clock speed735 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate128.010.80
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs323
TMUs12812
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.94 1.47
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon E8950 has a 780.3% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 510, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon E8950 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 510 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950
Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
Arc A350M Arc A350M
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
vs
HD Graphics 515 HD Graphics 515
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465
vs
9600 GTX GeForce 9600 GTX
Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
Radeon E8870 Radeon E8870
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
Radeon E8870 Radeon E8870
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
R9 M290X Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
GTX 285M GeForce GTX 285M
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
RTX 2060 TU104 GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 415 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8950 or HD Graphics 510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.