GeForce2 Go vs Radeon E6465

Place in the ranking	1203	1510
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.65	0.34
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	Caicos	NV11 B2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	29 September 2015 (9 years ago)	11 November 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	160	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	143 MHz
Number of transistors	370 million	20 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	2 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.800	0.57
Floating-point processing power	0.192 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	2
TMUs	8	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	7.0
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E6465 0.60
+5900%

GeForce2 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon E6465 231
+5675%

GeForce2 Go 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.60	0.01
Recency	29 September 2015	11 November 2000
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	2 Watt

Radeon E6465 has a 5900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon E6465 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Go in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.