Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs ATI Radeon E2400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1427not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.36no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV610GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores405120
Core clock speed600 MHz1312 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors180 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400489.6
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs4320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz876 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s897.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

ATI E2400 has 900% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E2400 and Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E2400 is a notebook card while Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.