HD Graphics P4700 vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1415not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.22no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameR350Haswell GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data160
Core clock speed380 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors117 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate3.04026.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed340 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.3
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 150 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 86 Watt

ATI 9800 PRO has 83% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 581.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO
Intel HD Graphics P4700
HD Graphics P4700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 58 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.