GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9600 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9600 XT with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI 9600 XT
2003
128 MB DDR, 22 Watt
0.08

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms ATI 9600 XT by a whopping 45850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1505142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.2818.69
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV360TU104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2003 (21 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed500 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors60 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)22 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1137
1440p-0−195
4K-0−165

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
God of War 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 178
+0%
178
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
God of War 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 171
+0%
171
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
God of War 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 198
+0%
198
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
God of War 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 136
+0%
136
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
God of War 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
God of War 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 52
+0%
52
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 36.76
Recency 1 October 2003 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 22 Watt 150 Watt

ATI 9600 XT has 581.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 45850% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9600 XT is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9600 XT
Radeon 9600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 50 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 134 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9600 XT or GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.