Quadro FX 330 vs ATI Radeon 9600 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1443not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRV350NV37
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2003 (21 year ago)28 June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors60 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6001.000
ROPs42
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0a
OpenGL2.01.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 28 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 21 Watt

ATI 9600 PRO has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 15.4% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

FX 330, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9600 PRO and Quadro FX 330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop card while Quadro FX 330 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 72 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.