ATI Radeon E2400 vs ATI 9000 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV250RV610
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed275 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors36 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.1002.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.048 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xMXM-II
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s11.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.110.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 25 Watt

ATI E2400 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 130.8% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 PRO and Radeon E2400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop card while Radeon E2400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO
ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.