FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon 860M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.36no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameStrix PointCapsaicin
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)31 March 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124096 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate96.00217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs32256 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.