UHD Graphics 615 vs ATI Radeon 8500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated900
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.69
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR250Amber Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2002 (22 years ago)7 November 2018 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40021.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs43
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2002 7 November 2018
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 615 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 XT and UHD Graphics 615. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8500 XT is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 615 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500 XT
Radeon 8500 XT
Intel UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics 615

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 33 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.