Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 840M and Iris Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 840M
2024
9.25

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms 840M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking489483
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
ArchitectureRDNA 3+ (2024)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameKrackan PointTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 June 2024 (1 year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25696
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR4
Memory clock speed7500 MHzno data
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno dataDirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 840M 9.25
Iris Xe Graphics G7 9.35
+1.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 840M 8453
+26%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 840M 5606
+16.3%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 840M 37360
Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040
+1.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 84
+5%
80−85
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
God of War 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Counter-Strike 2 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
God of War 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−0.7%
140−150
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
God of War 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 32
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Valorant 100−110
−1%
100−110
+1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
God of War 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Radeon 840M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 840M is 4% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 10% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 17 tests (40%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.25 9.35
Recency 2 June 2024 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm

Radeon 840M has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 840M and Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2945 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or Iris Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.