Radeon 820M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.35
+625%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms 820M by a whopping 625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4831050
Place by popularity18not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeKrackan Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)2 June 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4no data
Memory clock speedno data7500 MHz
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Fortnite 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Valorant 90−95
+176%
30−35
−176%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+380%
30−33
−380%
Dota 2 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Fortnite 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Valorant 90−95
+176%
30−35
−176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Dota 2 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+813%
8−9
−813%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 100−110
+2000%
5−6
−2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Dota 2 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

God of War 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 3400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 31 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.35 1.29
Recency 15 August 2020 2 June 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 624.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2945 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.