Radeon RX 8060S vs 8065S
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 8065S and Radeon RX 8060S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8065S outperforms 8060S by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 98 | 122 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 40 |
| Boost clock speed | 3000 MHz | 2900 MHz |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 110−120
+6.8%
| 103
−6.8%
|
| 1440p | 55−60
+7.8%
| 51
−7.8%
|
| 4K | 35−40
+0%
| 35
+0%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+8.6%
|
220−230
−8.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+11.6%
|
95−100
−11.6%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 120−130
+12.7%
|
110−120
−12.7%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+5.1%
|
130−140
−5.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+11.6%
|
215
−11.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+11.6%
|
95−100
−11.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+46.9%
|
96
−46.9%
|
| Fortnite | 190−200
+9.8%
|
170−180
−9.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+10.3%
|
150−160
−10.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 140−150
+10.2%
|
120−130
−10.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+6.4%
|
150−160
−6.4%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+7.7%
|
230−240
−7.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+5.1%
|
130−140
−5.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+120%
|
109
−120%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+11.6%
|
95−100
−11.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+48.4%
|
95
−48.4%
|
| Fortnite | 190−200
+9.8%
|
170−180
−9.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+10.3%
|
150−160
−10.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 140−150
+10.2%
|
120−130
−10.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 140−150
+11.8%
|
127
−11.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 100−110
+11.3%
|
95−100
−11.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+6.4%
|
150−160
−6.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160−170
+15.1%
|
140−150
−15.1%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+7.7%
|
230−240
−7.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+5.1%
|
130−140
−5.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+11.6%
|
95−100
−11.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+53.3%
|
92
−53.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+10.3%
|
150−160
−10.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+6.4%
|
150−160
−6.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160−170
+66.3%
|
101
−66.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 190−200
+9.8%
|
170−180
−9.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+67.6%
|
71
−67.6%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 300−350
+11.3%
|
280−290
−11.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 95−100
+35.7%
|
70
−35.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65−70
+11.7%
|
60−65
−11.7%
|
| Valorant | 280−290
+7.5%
|
260−270
−7.5%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+8.8%
|
100−110
−8.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
+14.6%
|
45−50
−14.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+11.1%
|
95−100
−11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+13.8%
|
110−120
−13.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90−95
+15.4%
|
75−80
−15.4%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 120−130
+12%
|
100−110
−12%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+50%
|
36
−50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 100−110
+34.2%
|
76
−34.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+13.5%
|
35−40
−13.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75
+13.8%
|
65−70
−13.8%
|
| Valorant | 270−280
+9.7%
|
240−250
−9.7%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+10.8%
|
65−70
−10.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+13.6%
|
21−24
−13.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+14.8%
|
50−55
−14.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+14.1%
|
75−80
−14.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+17.9%
|
55−60
−17.9%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 60−65
+15.1%
|
50−55
−15.1%
|
This is how Radeon 8065S and RX 8060S compete in popular games:
- Radeon 8065S is 7% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 8065S is 8% faster in 1440p
- A tie in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 120% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 8065S performs better in 53 tests (98%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
