RTX A4500 Embedded vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with RTX A4500 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.18
+108%

8060S outperforms RTX A4500 Embedded by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.4119.28
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStrix HaloGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25605888
Core clock speed1295 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate373.6223.6
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores4046

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.18
+108%
RTX A4500 Embedded 20.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 17677
+108%
RTX A4500 Embedded 8485

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+120%
60−65
−120%
1440p79
+126%
35−40
−126%
4K52
+117%
24−27
−117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+110%
110−120
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
God of War 117
+113%
55−60
−113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+115%
65−70
−115%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+115%
100−105
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Far Cry 5 106
+112%
50−55
−112%
Fortnite 180−190
+114%
85−90
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+119%
75−80
−119%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+112%
95−100
−112%
God of War 96
+113%
45−50
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+117%
75−80
−117%
Valorant 240−250
+120%
110−120
−120%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+115%
65−70
−115%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+118%
50−55
−118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+114%
130−140
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Far Cry 5 104
+131%
45−50
−131%
Fortnite 180−190
+114%
85−90
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+119%
75−80
−119%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+114%
85−90
−114%
God of War 76
+117%
35−40
−117%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+112%
60−65
−112%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+117%
75−80
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+118%
100−105
−118%
Valorant 240−250
+120%
110−120
−120%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+115%
65−70
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Far Cry 5 97
+116%
45−50
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+119%
75−80
−119%
God of War 49
+133%
21−24
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+117%
75−80
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+128%
50−55
−128%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+114%
85−90
−114%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+113%
140−150
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+133%
30−33
−133%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Valorant 270−280
+109%
130−140
−109%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+114%
50−55
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
Far Cry 5 89
+123%
40−45
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+108%
60−65
−108%
God of War 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+113%
40−45
−113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+117%
35−40
−117%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+111%
27−30
−111%
Valorant 250−260
+115%
120−130
−115%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry 5 49
+133%
21−24
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+110%
40−45
−110%
God of War 35
+119%
16−18
−119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%

This is how Radeon 8060S and RTX A4500 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 120% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 126% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 117% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.18 20.25
Recency 6 January 2025 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 80 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 108.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 45.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4500 Embedded in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
RTX A4500 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or RTX A4500 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.