Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.17
+71.2%

8060S outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98242
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.4153.61
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameStrix HaloAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1295 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate373.6129.6
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.17
+71.2%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 24.63

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8060S 40732
+101%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 8060S 96996
+46.3%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 27659
+95.7%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+76%
75−80
−76%
1440p79
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
4K52
+73.3%
30−35
−73.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+77.7%
130−140
−77.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
God of War 117
+80%
65−70
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+75%
80−85
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+79.2%
120−130
−79.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Far Cry 5 106
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Fortnite 180−190
+82%
100−105
−82%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+72.6%
95−100
−72.6%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+82.7%
110−120
−82.7%
God of War 96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+71.6%
95−100
−71.6%
Valorant 240−250
+72.1%
140−150
−72.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+75%
80−85
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+81.7%
60−65
−81.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+73.8%
160−170
−73.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Far Cry 5 104
+73.3%
60−65
−73.3%
Fortnite 180−190
+82%
100−105
−82%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+72.6%
95−100
−72.6%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+82%
100−105
−82%
God of War 76
+90%
40−45
−90%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+81.4%
70−75
−81.4%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+71.7%
60−65
−71.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+71.6%
95−100
−71.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+81.7%
120−130
−81.7%
Valorant 240−250
+72.1%
140−150
−72.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+75%
80−85
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Far Cry 5 97
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+72.6%
95−100
−72.6%
God of War 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+71.6%
95−100
−71.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+75.4%
65−70
−75.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+82%
100−105
−82%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+74.7%
170−180
−74.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+75%
40−45
−75%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Valorant 270−280
+81.3%
150−160
−81.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Far Cry 5 89
+78%
50−55
−78%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+78.6%
70−75
−78.6%
God of War 40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+75.4%
65−70
−75.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+90%
40−45
−90%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Valorant 250−260
+72%
150−160
−72%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
God of War 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%

This is how Radeon 8060S and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 76% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 76% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 73% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.17 24.63
Recency 6 January 2025 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 71.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 38 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.