Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 8060S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with Quadro P2000, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
34.81
+114%

8060S outperforms P2000 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.40
Power efficiencyno data17.20
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameStrix PointGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2025 (recently)6 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$585

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1295 MHz1076 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate373.694.72
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS3.031 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs16064
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared5 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data140.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 34.81
+114%
Quadro P2000 16.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 15553
+114%
Quadro P2000 7268

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+96.4%
56
−96.4%
1440p40−45
+100%
20
−100%
4K30−35
+87.5%
16
−87.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.45
1440pno data29.25
4Kno data36.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Fortnite 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+0%
38
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
+0%
7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+0%
10
+0%

This is how Radeon 8060S and Quadro P2000 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 96% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 100% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 88% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.81 16.26
Chip lithography 4 nm 16 nm

Radeon 8060S has a 114.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook card while Quadro P2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 681 vote

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Quadro P2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.