Quadro K1200 vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with Quadro K1200, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.18
+497%

8060S outperforms K1200 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.15
Power efficiency58.4211.97
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameStrix HaloGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$321.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560512
Core clock speed1295 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate373.635.97
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16032
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Shared128 Bit
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 80 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.18
+497%
Quadro K1200 7.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 17677
+497%
Quadro K1200 2962

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
+563%
16−18
−563%
1440p57
+533%
9−10
−533%
4K36
+500%
6−7
−500%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data20.12
1440pno data35.77
4Kno data53.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+560%
35−40
−560%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%
God of War 117
+550%
18−20
−550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+514%
35−40
−514%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%
Far Cry 5 106
+563%
16−18
−563%
Fortnite 180−190
+507%
30−33
−507%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+507%
27−30
−507%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+570%
30−33
−570%
God of War 96
+500%
16−18
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+504%
27−30
−504%
Valorant 240−250
+505%
40−45
−505%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+506%
18−20
−506%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+518%
45−50
−518%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%
Far Cry 5 104
+550%
16−18
−550%
Fortnite 180−190
+507%
30−33
−507%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+507%
27−30
−507%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+507%
30−33
−507%
God of War 76
+533%
12−14
−533%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+505%
21−24
−505%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+544%
16−18
−544%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+504%
27−30
−504%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+523%
35−40
−523%
Valorant 240−250
+505%
40−45
−505%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%
Far Cry 5 97
+506%
16−18
−506%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+507%
27−30
−507%
God of War 49
+513%
8−9
−513%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+504%
27−30
−504%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+533%
18−20
−533%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+507%
30−33
−507%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+610%
10−11
−610%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+562%
45−50
−562%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+600%
10−11
−600%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+540%
10−11
−540%
Valorant 270−280
+504%
45−50
−504%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+569%
16−18
−569%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+538%
8−9
−538%
Far Cry 5 89
+536%
14−16
−536%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
God of War 40
+567%
6−7
−567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+507%
14−16
−507%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+539%
18−20
−539%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+500%
6−7
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+533%
12−14
−533%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+533%
9−10
−533%
Valorant 250−260
+545%
40−45
−545%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+580%
10−11
−580%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Far Cry 5 49
+513%
8−9
−513%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+500%
14−16
−500%
God of War 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+510%
10−11
−510%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+544%
9−10
−544%

This is how Radeon 8060S and Quadro K1200 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 563% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 533% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.18 7.07
Recency 6 January 2025 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 496.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K1200, on the other hand, has 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K1200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 40 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 113 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Quadro K1200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.