GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S and GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8060S
2025
41.97
+581%

8060S outperforms GTX 780M Mac Edition by a whopping 581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98606
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.84
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameStrix PointGK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2025 (recently)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601536
Core clock speed1295 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data122 Watt
Texture fill rate373.6102.0
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS2.448 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs160128
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.97 6.16
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm

Radeon 8060S has a 581.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 36 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.