FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency59.15no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameStrix HaloCapsaicin
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)31 March 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096 ×2
Core clock speed1295 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate464.0217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power14.85 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6464 ×2
TMUs160256 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB2 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 31 March 2016
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 8060S has an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 445.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8060S and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 71 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.