Radeon 610M vs 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8050S
2025
55 Watt
37.68
+1333%

8050S outperforms 610M by a whopping 1333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129836
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Power efficiencyno data13.36
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStrix HaloDragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed1295 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate298.917.60
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Cores322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 37.68
+1333%
Radeon 610M 2.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8050S 15788
+1331%
Radeon 610M 1103

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8050S 36323
+1052%
Radeon 610M 3153

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 8050S 79256
+573%
Radeon 610M 11776

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8050S 23521
+974%
Radeon 610M 2191

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8050S 130145
+796%
Radeon 610M 14518

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+731%
13
−731%
1440p350−400
+1300%
25
−1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1660%
5−6
−1660%
God of War 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+1356%
9−10
−1356%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1660%
5−6
−1660%
Far Cry 5 100
+614%
14
−614%
Fortnite 160−170
+1079%
14−16
−1079%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+1031%
12−14
−1031%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2280%
5−6
−2280%
God of War 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1054%
12−14
−1054%
Valorant 220−230
+407%
40−45
−407%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+1356%
9−10
−1356%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+445%
50−55
−445%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1660%
5−6
−1660%
Far Cry 5 96
+638%
13
−638%
Fortnite 160−170
+1079%
14−16
−1079%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+1031%
12−14
−1031%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2280%
5−6
−2280%
God of War 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+638%
16
−638%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+911%
9
−911%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1054%
12−14
−1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+1100%
13
−1100%
Valorant 220−230
+407%
40−45
−407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+1356%
9−10
−1356%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1660%
5−6
−1660%
Far Cry 5 85
+608%
12
−608%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+1031%
12−14
−1031%
God of War 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1054%
12−14
−1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+1050%
8
−1050%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+1079%
14−16
−1079%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+1295%
18−20
−1295%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Valorant 250−260
+318%
61
−318%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1533%
6−7
−1533%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1700%
6−7
−1700%
God of War 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+1900%
5−6
−1900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+406%
16−18
−406%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Valorant 230−240
+1685%
12−14
−1685%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
God of War 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how Radeon 8050S and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 731% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8050S is 1300% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 8050S is 7600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is ahead in 49 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.68 2.63
Recency 6 January 2025 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 8050S has a 1332.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1037 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.