GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs Radeon 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking343not rated
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency83.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code namePhoenixGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)17 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768240 ×2
Core clock speed800 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistors25,390 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate139.251.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power8.909 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs4880 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1152 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.5 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.84.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2024 17 June 2009
Chip lithography 4 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 315 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 2000% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 X2
GeForce GTX 285 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2032 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 780M or GeForce GTX 285 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.