GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs RTX 2050 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGA107NV36S
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)18 August 2003 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed832 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data82 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate73.921.700
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0a
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2021 18 August 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 2050 Max-Q has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 216 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.