Quadro FX 550M vs ATI Radeon 7500 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV200G73
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date16 April 2002 (22 years ago)13 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed260 MHz480 MHz
Number of transistors60 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.5605.760
ROPs28
TMUs612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed360 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.76 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.32.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2002 13 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 35 Watt

ATI 7500 Mac Edition has 52.2% lower power consumption.

FX 550M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 Mac Edition and Quadro FX 550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 Mac Edition is a desktop card while Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7500 Mac Edition
Radeon 7500 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 7500 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.