GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs ATI Radeon 7500 Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data44.10
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV200AD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 April 2002 (22 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data9728
Core clock speed260 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors60 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.560515.3
Floating-point processing powerno data32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs2112
TMUs6304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed180 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.76 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2002 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 120 Watt

ATI 7500 Mac Edition has 421.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 Mac Edition and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 Mac Edition is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7500 Mac Edition
Radeon 7500 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 7500 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 595 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.