Tesla K40d vs ATI Radeon 7500 LE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV200GK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2001 (23 years ago)22 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2880
Core clock speed250 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors60 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate1.500210.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs6240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed175 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.6 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 245 Watt

ATI 7500 LE has 965.2% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40d, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 LE and Tesla K40d. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 LE is a desktop card while Tesla K40d is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7500 LE
Radeon 7500 LE
NVIDIA Tesla K40d
Tesla K40d

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 7500 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40d on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.