RTX A1000 vs Radeon 740M

Place in the ranking	525	212
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	37.49	38.76
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Phoenix	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	2304
Core clock speed	800 MHz	727 MHz
Boost clock speed	2500 MHz	1462 MHz
Number of transistors	25,390 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	105.3
Floating-point processing power	2.56 TFLOPS	6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	72
Tensor Cores	no data	72
Ray Tracing Cores	4	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	163 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 740M 7.09

RTX A1000 24.43
+245%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 740M 3167

RTX A1000 10919
+245%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−233%

70−75
+233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	31 −223%	100−105 +223%
Counter-Strike 2	73 −242%	250−260 +242%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	23 −226%	75−80 +226%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Counter-Strike 2	60 −233%	200−210 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −240%	85−90 +240%
Fortnite	45−50 −240%	160−170 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −239%	95−100 +239%
Valorant	80−85 −238%	270−280 +238%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	13 −208%	40−45 +208%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Counter-Strike 2	26 −227%	85−90 +227%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120−130 −228%	400−450 +228%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −240%	85−90 +240%
Fortnite	45−50 −240%	160−170 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%
Grand Theft Auto V	29 −228%	95−100 +228%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −239%	95−100 +239%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
Valorant	80−85 −238%	270−280 +238%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −240%	85−90 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −239%	95−100 +239%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
Valorant	80−85 −238%	270−280 +238%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

45−50
−240%

160−170

+240%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	55−60 −239%	200−210 +239%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −225%	130−140 +225%
Valorant	85−90 −233%	290−300 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

16−18

−244%

55−60
+244%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Valorant	40−45 −225%	130−140 +225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%