GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon 740M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 740M with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 740M
2023
15 Watt
7.10

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 740M by a whopping 847% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52013
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.55
Power efficiency37.3924.15
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePhoenixAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2567168
Core clock speed800 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed2500 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate40.00554.4
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Cores456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 740M 7.10
RTX 4070 SUPER 67.25
+847%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 740M 3174
RTX 4070 SUPER 30054
+847%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 740M 7490
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+813%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 740M 5135
RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+852%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−933%
217
+933%
1440p14−16
−857%
134
+857%
4K8−9
−925%
82
+925%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.76
1440pno data4.47
4Kno data7.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 31
−610%
220−230
+610%
Counter-Strike 2 73
−347%
300−350
+347%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−1125%
196
+1125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 23
−857%
220−230
+857%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−447%
180−190
+447%
Counter-Strike 2 60
−443%
300−350
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−1050%
184
+1050%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−712%
203
+712%
Fortnite 45−50
−543%
300−350
+543%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−762%
290−300
+762%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−796%
200−210
+796%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−532%
170−180
+532%
Valorant 80−85
−436%
400−450
+436%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 13
−1592%
220−230
+1592%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−447%
180−190
+447%
Counter-Strike 2 26
−1154%
300−350
+1154%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−128%
270−280
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−894%
159
+894%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−700%
200
+700%
Fortnite 45−50
−543%
300−350
+543%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−762%
290−300
+762%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−796%
200−210
+796%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−497%
173
+497%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−1133%
185
+1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−532%
170−180
+532%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−1960%
412
+1960%
Valorant 80−85
−436%
400−450
+436%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−447%
180−190
+447%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−800%
144
+800%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−660%
190
+660%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−762%
290−300
+762%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−532%
170−180
+532%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−905%
201
+905%
Valorant 80−85
−436%
400−450
+436%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−543%
300−350
+543%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1662%
220−230
+1662%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−775%
500−550
+775%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−1380%
148
+1380%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1375%
118
+1375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−338%
170−180
+338%
Valorant 85−90
−457%
450−500
+457%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−1100%
190−200
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1433%
92
+1433%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1044%
183
+1044%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1339%
250−260
+1339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1183%
154
+1183%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−844%
150−160
+844%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−1083%
70−75
+1083%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 100−110
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−774%
166
+774%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2367%
74
+2367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2117%
133
+2117%
Valorant 40−45
−730%
300−350
+730%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1600%
130−140
+1600%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1188%
103
+1188%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1717%
210−220
+1717%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1029%
75−80
+1029%

This is how Radeon 740M and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 933% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 857% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 925% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 2367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 SUPER surpassed Radeon 740M in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.10 67.25
Recency 4 January 2023 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 220 Watt

Radeon 740M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 847.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 740M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 117 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5037 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 740M or GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.