Tesla S1075 vs ATI Radeon 7200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR100GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed166 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors30 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate148.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 800 Watt

ATI 7200 has 3378.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop card while Tesla S1075 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
Tesla S1075

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.