Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ATI Radeon 7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon 7000 Radeon 7000 Mac Edition Radeon 7000 Mac Edition PCI Radeon 7000 PCI Radeon 7200 Radeon 7200 64 MB Radeon 7500 Radeon 7500 LE Radeon 7500 Mac Edition
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 685 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Qualcomm Adreno 830

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 7200 with Qualcomm Adreno 680, including specs and performance data.

ATI 7200
2000
32 MB DDR, 23 Watt
0.01

Qualcomm Adreno 680 outperforms ATI 7200 by a whopping 21800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

ATI 7200 Radeon 7200
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1535867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.0321.88
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)no data
GPU code nameR100no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed166 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate1no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount32 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed166 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI 7200 0.01
Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.19
+21800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 7200 2
Qualcomm Adreno 680 861
+42950%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 2.19
Recency 1 April 2000 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 21800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop card while Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI 7200 Radeon 7200
vs
ATI 9200 Radeon 9200
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
vs
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
ATI 7200 Radeon 7200
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
ATI 9000 9000
vs
GeForce MX250 MX250
ATI 9000 LE 9000 LE
vs
RX 6550M RX 6550M
ATI 9000 PRO 9000 PRO
vs
Riva TNT2 M64 Riva TNT2 M64
ATI 8500 XT 8500 XT
vs
Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Efficient
ATI 8500 8500
vs
Radeon 660M 660M
ATI 7200 64 MB 7200 64 MB
vs
Xbox XGPU-S Xbox XGPU S
ATI 7200 64 MB 7200 64 MB
vs
RX 6850M XT RX 6850M XT
ATI Rage 128 PRO Rage 128 PRO
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 GeForce4 Ti 4200
ATI 3D Rage PRO PCI 3D Rage PRO PCI
vs
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
i740 i740
vs
RTX 5060 Ti RTX 5060 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 38 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7200 or Qualcomm Adreno 680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.