ATI Radeon 7200 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8641611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.60no data
Architectureno dataRage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameno dataR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data166 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX127.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 1087
+54250%
Samples: 24
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Fortnite 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 43 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Fortnite 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 35 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 12−14 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 1 April 2000
Chip lithography 5 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 23 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3500% more advanced lithography process, and 229% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 24 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 690 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.