RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated36
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.30
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR100no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed166 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate1no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

ATI 7200 64 MB has 552.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 22 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 64 MB and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 64 MB is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB
Radeon 7200 64 MB
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.